You are here
HIV Strains: Types, Groups and Subtypes
HIV types, groups and subtypes
HIV is a highly variable virus which mutates very readily. This means there are many different strains of HIV, even within the body of a single infected person.
Based on genetic similarities, the numerous virus strains may be classified into types, groups and subtypes.
What is the difference between HIV-1 and HIV-2?
There are two types of HIV: HIV-1 and HIV-2. Both types are transmitted by sexual contact, through blood, and from mother to child, and they appear to cause clinically indistinguishable AIDS. However, it seems that HIV-2 is less easily transmitted, and the period between initial infection and illness is longer in the case of HIV-2.
Worldwide, the predominant virus is HIV-1, and generally when people refer to HIV without specifying the type of virus they will be referring to HIV-1. The relatively uncommon HIV-2 type is concentrated in West Africa and is rarely found elsewhere.
How many subtypes of HIV-1 are there?
The strains of HIV-1 can be classified into four groups: the "major" group M, the "outlier" group O and two new groups, N and P. These four groups may represent four separate introductions of simian immunodeficiency virus into humans.
Group O appears to be restricted to west-central Africa and group N - a strain discovered in 1998 in Cameroon - is extremely rare. In 2009 a new strain closely relating to gorilla simian immunodeficiency virus was discovered in a Cameroonian woman. It was designated HIV-1 group P. 1 More than 90 percent of HIV-1 infections belong to HIV-1 group M and, unless specified, the rest of this page will relate to HIV-1 group M only.
Within group M there are known to be at least nine genetically distinct subtypes (or clades) of HIV-1. These are subtypes A, B, C, D, F, G, H, J and K. 2
Occasionally, two viruses of different subtypes can meet in the cell of an infected person and mix together their genetic material to create a new hybrid virus (a process similar to sexual reproduction, and sometimes called "viral sex"). 3 Many of these new strains do not survive for long, but those that infect more than one person are known as "circulating recombinant forms" or CRFs. For example, the CRF A/B is a mixture of subtypes A and B.
The classification of HIV strains into subtypes and CRFs is a complex issue and the definitions are subject to change as new discoveries are made. Some scientists talk about subtypes A1, A2, A3, F1 and F2 instead of A and F, though others regard the former as sub-subtypes.
What about subtypes E and I?
One of the CRFs is called A/E because it is thought to have resulted from hybridization between subtype A and some other "parent" subtype E. However, no one has ever found a pure form of subtype E. Confusingly, many people still refer to the CRF A/E as "subtype E" (in fact it is most correctly called CRF01_AE). 4
A virus isolated in Cyprus was originally placed in a new subtype I, before being reclassified as a recombinant form A/G/I. It is now thought that this virus represents an even more complex CRF comprised of subtypes A, G, H, K and unclassified regions. The designation "I" is no longer used. 5
Where are the different subtypes and CRFs found?
The HIV-1 subtypes and CRFs are typically associated with certain geographical regions, with the most widespread being subtypes A and C. As studies have shown, individuals are increasingly presenting with sub-types not native to the country of diagnosis. 6 7 For example, a rise of non-B sub-types among men who have sex with men (MSM) in the UK has been identified. 8
- Subtype A and CRF A/G predominate in West and Central Africa, with subtype A possibly also causing much of the Russian epidemic. 9
- Historically, subtype B has been the most common subtype/CRF in Europe, the Americas, Japan and Australia and is the predominant sub-type found among MSM infected in Europe. 10 Although this remains the case, other subtypes are becoming more frequent and now account for at least 25 percent of new HIV infections in Europe.
- Subtype C is predominant in Southern and East Africa, India and Nepal. It has caused the world's worst HIV epidemics and is responsible for around half of all infections.
- Subtype D is generally limited to East and Central Africa. CRF A/E is prevalent in South-East Asia, but originated in Central Africa. Subtype F has been found in Central Africa, South America and Eastern Europe. Subtype G and CRF A/G have been observed in West and East Africa and Central Europe.
- Subtype H has only been found in Central Africa; J only in Central America; and K only in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Cameroon.
As a Belgium study highlighted, local epidemics can be better understood if sub-types, patient demographics and transmission routes are recorded. 11 Furthermore, the availability of this data can be used to target risk groups more accurately and to improve the effectiveness of prevention strategies.
Are more subtypes likely to "appear"?
It is almost certain that new HIV genetic subtypes and CRFs will be discovered in the future, and indeed that new ones will develop as virus recombination and mutation continue to occur. The current subtypes and CRFs will also continue to spread to new areas as the global epidemic continues.
The implications of variability
Does subtype affect disease progression?
A study presented in 2006 found that Ugandans infected with subtype D or recombinant strains incorporating subtype D developed AIDS sooner than those infected with subtype A, and also died sooner, if they did not receive antiretroviral treatment. The study's authors suggested that subtype D is more virulent because it is more effective at binding to immune cells. 12 This result was supported by another study presented in 2007, which found that Kenyan women infected with subtype D had more than twice the risk of death over six years compared with those infected with subtype A. 13 An earlier study of sex workers in Senegal, published in 1999, found that women infected with subtype C, D or G were more likely to develop AIDS within five years of infection than those infected with subtype A. 14
Several studies conducted in Thailand suggest that people infected with CRF A/E progress faster to AIDS and death than those infected with subtype B, if they do not receive antiretroviral treatment. 15
Are there differences in transmission?
It has been observed that certain subtypes/CRFs are predominantly associated with specific modes of transmission. 16 In particular, subtype B is spread mostly by homosexual contact and intravenous drug use (essentially via blood), while subtype C and CRF A/E tend to fuel heterosexual epidemics (via a mucosal route).
Whether there are biological causes for the observed differences in transmission routes remains the subject of debate. Some scientists, such as Dr Max Essex of Harvard, believe such causes do exist. Among their claims are that subtype C and CRF A/E are transmitted much more efficiently during heterosexual sex than subtype B. 17 18 However, this theory has not been conclusively proven. 19 20
More recent studies have looked for variation between subtypes in rates of mother-to-child transmission. One of these found that such transmission is more common with subtype D than subtype A. 21 Another reached the opposite conclusion (A worse than D), and also found that subtype C was more often transmitted that subtype D. 22 A third study concluded that subtype C is more transmissible than either D or A. 23 Other researchers have found no association between subtype and rates of mother-to-child transmission. 24 25 26 27
Is it possible to be infected more than once?
Until about 1994, it was generally thought that individuals do not become infected with multiple distinct HIV-1 strains. Since then, many cases of people coinfected with two or more strains have been documented.
All cases of coinfection were once assumed to be the result of people being exposed to the different strains more or less simultaneously, before their immune systems had had a chance to react. However, it is now thought that "superinfection" is also occurring. In these cases, the second infection occurred several months after the first. It would appear that the body's immune response to the first virus is sometimes not enough to prevent infection with a second strain, especially with a virus belonging to a different subtype. It is not yet known how commonly superinfection occurs, or whether it can take place only in special circumstances. 28 29 30 31
Do HIV antibody tests detect all types, groups and subtypes?
Compared with first generation EIA antibody tests that were initially developed, third and fourth generation EIA antibody tests are significantly more accurate. Unlike previous tests, the fourth generation test detects HIV antibodies and antigens simultaneously. 33 The WHO recommends that tests should have an accuracy rate of 99 percent and whilst most do, this may vary slightly between the test brands. 34 35 36
The most-up-to date (fourth generation) EIA tests detect both HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. 37 Although most HIV infections are HIV-1 group M, EIA tests are also able to detect infections with rare groups and subtypes.
However, as HIV-2 and group O infections are extremely rare in most countries, routine screening programs might not be designed to test for them. 38 Anyone who believes they may have contracted HIV-2, HIV-1 group O or one of the rarer subtypes of group M should seek expert advice.
What are the treatment implications?
Although most current HIV-1 antiretroviral drugs were designed for use against subtype B, there is no compelling evidence that they are any less effective against other subtypes. Nevertheless, some subtypes may be more likely to develop resistance to certain drugs, and the types of mutations associated with resistance may vary. 39 This is an important subject for future research.
The effectiveness of HIV-1 treatment is monitored using viral load tests. It has been demonstrated that some viral load tests are sensitive only to subtype B and can produce a significant underestimate of viral load if used to process other strains. 40 41 The latest tests do claim to produce accurate results for most Group M subtypes, though not necessarily for Group O. It is important that health workers and patients are aware of the subtype/CRF they are testing for and of the limitations of the test they are applying.
Not all of the drugs used to treat HIV-1 infection are as effective against HIV-2. 42 In particular, HIV-2 has a natural resistance to NNRTI antiretroviral drugs and they are therefore not recommended. As yet there is no FDA-licensed viral load test for HIV-2 and those designed for HIV-1 are not reliable for monitoring the other type. Instead, response to treatment may be monitored by following CD4+ T-cell counts and indicators of immune system deterioration. 43 More research and clinical experience is needed to determine the most effective treatment for HIV-2.
What are the implications for an AIDS vaccine?
The development of an AIDS vaccine is affected by the range of virus subtypes as well as by the wide variety of human populations who need protection and who differ, for example, in their genetic make-up and their routes of exposure to HIV. In particular, the occurrence of superinfection indicates that an immune response triggered by a vaccine to prevent infection by one strain of HIV may not protect against all other strains. The increasing variety of sub-types found within countries suggests that the effectiveness of a vaccine is likely to vary between populations, unless an innovative method is developed which guards against many virus strains. 44
Inevitably, different types of candidate vaccines will have to be tested against various viral strains in multiple vaccine trials, conducted in both high-income and developing countries.
- 1. Plantier, J.C. (2009) 'A new human immunodeficiency virus derived from gorillas', Nature Medicine, 2nd August.
- 2. WHO (2011) ' HIV/AIDS'
- 3. Burke DS (1997, September) ' Recombination of HIV: An Important Viral Evolutionary Strategy' Emerging Infectious Diseases 3(3)
- 4. Los Alamos National Laboratory (2005-2006) ' The Circulating Recombinant Forms (CRFs)'
- 5. Gao F et. al (1998, December) ' An Isolate of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Originally Classified as Subtype I Represents a Complex Mosaic Comprising Three Different Group M Subtypes (A, G, and I)' Journal of Virology 72(12)
- 6. Le Vu S, et. al (2010, 9th September) ' Population-based HIV-1 incidence in France, 2003–08: a modelling analysis' The Lancet 10
- 7. Chalmet K, et. al (2010) ' Epidemiological study of phylogenetic transmission clusters in a local HIV-1 epidemic reveals distinct differences between subtype B and non-B infections' BMC Infectious Diseases 10(262)
- 8. Fox J, et. al (2010) ' Epidemiology of non-B clade forms of HIV-1 in men who have sex with men in the UK' AIDS 24
- 9. Bobkov AF et. al (2004, October) ' Temporal trends in the HIV-1 epidemic in Russia: predominance of subtype A' J Med Virol 74(2)
- 10. Le Vu S, et. al (2010, 9th September) ' Population-based HIV-1 incidence in France, 2003–08: a modelling analysis' The Lancet 10
- 11. Chalmet K, et. al (2010) ' Epidemiological study of phylogenetic transmission clusters in a local HIV-1 epidemic reveals distinct differences between subtype B and non-B infections' BMC Infectious Diseases 10(262)
- 12. Laeyendecker O et. al (2006, February) ' The Effect of HIV Subtype on Rapid Disease Progression in Rakai, Uganda' 13th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (abstract no. 44LB)
- 13. Baeten D et. al (2007, 15th April) ' HIV-1 subtype D infection is associated with faster disease progression than subtype A, in spite of similar HIV-1 plasma viral loads' Journal of Infectious Disease 195(8)
- 14. Kanki PJ et. al (1999, January) ' Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Subtypes Differ in Disease Progression' Journal of Infectious Diseases, 179(1)
- 15. Nelson KE et. al (2007, November) ' Survival of blood donors and their spouses with HIV-1 subtype E (CRF01 A_E) infection in northern Thailand, 1992-2007' AIDS 21(S6)
- 16. Taylor BS et. al (2008) ' The Challenge of HIV-1 Subtype Diversity'
- 17. Bhoopat L et. al (2001, December) ' In vivo identification of Langerhans and related dendritic cells infected with HIV-1 subtype E in vaginal mucosa of asymptomatic patients' Modern Pathology 14(12)
- 18. Essex M (1996, 20th March) ' Retroviral vaccines: challenges for the developing world' AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses, 12(5)
- 19. Pope M et. al (1997, October) ' Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 strains of subtypes B and E replicate in cutaneous dendritic cell-T-cell mixtures without displaying subtype-specific tropism' J Virol 71(10)
- 20. Dittmar MT et. al (1997, October) ' Langerhans cell tropism of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype A through F isolates derived from different transmission groups' J Virol 71(10)
- 21. Yang, Li et. al (2003, 25th July) ' Genetic diversity of HIV-1 in western Kenya: subtype-specific differences in mother-to-child transmission' AIDS 17(11)
- 22. Blackard J T et. al (2001, 1st September) ' HIV-1 LTR subtype and perinatal transmission' J Virology, 287(2)
- 23. Renjifo B et. al (2004, 20th August) ' Preferential in-utero transmission of HIV-1 type C as compared to HIV-1 subtype A or D' AIDS 18(12)
- 24. Murray MC et. al (2000, February) ' Effect of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 viral genotype on mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1' J Infect Dis 181(2)
- 25. Tranchat C et. al (1999, November) ' Maternal humoral factors associated with perinatal human immunodeficiency virus type-1 transmission in a cohort from Kigali, Rwanda, 1988-1994' J Infect 39(3)
- 26. Tapia N et. al (2003, March) ' Influence of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtype on mother-to-child transmission' Journal of General Virology 84(Pt. 3)
- 27. Martinez AM et. al (2006, March) " Determinants of HIV-1 Mother-to-Child transmission in Southern Brazil" Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 78(1)
- 28. Gross KL et. al (2004, 23rd July) ' HIV-1 superinfection and viral diversity' AIDS 18(11)
- 29. Fultz PN (2004, 2nd January) ' HIV-1 superinfections: omens for vaccine efficacy?' AIDS 18(1)
- 30. Redd, AD et. al (2011, 22nd June) ' Identification of HIV superinfection in seroconcordant couples in Rakai, Uganda using next generation deep sequencing' J Clin Microbiol
- 31. Rachinger A et. al (2011, June) ' Low incidence of HIV-1 superinfection even after episodes of unsafe sexual behaviour of homosexual men in the Amsterdam Cohort Studies on HIV infection and AIDS' J Infect Dis 203(11)
- 32. Phillips S et. al (2000, July) ' Diagnosis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection with Different Subtypes Using Rapid Tests' Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology, 7(4)
- 33. Weber, B (2005) ' A New Automated Fourth-Generation HIV Screening Assay With Sensitive Antigen Detection Module and High Specificity' Methods in Molecular Biology 304
- 34. WHO/UNAIDS (2007) ' Guidance on provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling in health facilities'
- 35. Malm, K (2009) ' Performance of three automated fourth-generation combined HIV antigen/antibody assays in large-scale screening of blood donors and clinical samples' Transfus Med 19(2)
- 36. Pumarola, T et. al (2010) ' Performance evaluation of the ADVIA Centaur(®) HIV Ag/Ab Combo assay' J Virol Methods 170(1-2)
- 37. Ciccaglione, AR et. al (2010, August) ' Improving HIV-2 detection by a combination of serological and nucleic acid amplification test assays' J Clin Microbiology 48(8)
- 38. WHO (2009) ' HIV Assays: Operational Characteristics' Report 16: Rapid Assays
- 39. Parkin, NT et. al (2004, February) ' Antiretroviral drug resistance in non-subtype B HIV-1, HIV-2 and SIV' Antivir Ther 9(1)
- 40. Holguin, A et.al (2008, September) ' Performance of three commercial viral load assays, Versant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RNA bDNA v3.0, Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1, and NucliSens HIV-1 EasyQ v1.2, testing HIV-1 non-B subtypes and recombinant variants' Journal of Clinical Microbiology 46(9)
- 41. Rouet F et. al (2007) ' The measurement of HIV-1 viral load in resource-limited settings: how and where?' Clin Lab 53(3-4)
- 42. Gottlieb, GS et. al (2008, October) ' A call for randomized controlled trials of antiretroviral therapy for HIV-2 infection in West Africa' AIDS 16(2069-72)
- 43. Peterson, K et. al (2011) ' Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV-2 Infection: Recommendations for Management in Low-Resource Settings' AIDS Research and Treatment
- 44. Fox J, et. al (2010) ' Epidemiology of non-B clade forms of HIV-1 in men who have sex with men in the UK' AIDS 24
Leave your feedback about this page
We are unable to respond to any personal questions, or offer advice or information in relation to personal matters.